The law relating to Hindu and Mahomedan religious endowments, with commentaries on the Religious endowments act (Act XX of 1863) and Bengal and Madras regulations (XIX of 1810 and VII of 1817)

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1905 Excerpt: ... Baiju Lai Parbatia v. Bulak Lai Pathnk, (1897) I. L. P.., 24C. 385 (889, 890). 5. Afutndrav Bhikaji Phadke v. SankarDaji Charya, (1888) I. L. R.. 7 B. 323; Sriniram Chariar v. Raghava Chariar. (1897) I.L.R., 23 M. 28; Baiju Lai Parbatia v. Bulak Lai Pathitk, (1897) I. L. R., 24 C. 385 (390). But curiously enough in some of the cases it is said that if objection be taken the plaint ought to be amended and the plaintiffs permitted to proceed under S. 30, C. P. C. See iloidin Kutti v Krithnan, (1887) I. L. R., 10 M. 322 (330,333); per Besl,J.,in Subbayya v. Krishna, (1890).L.R., 14 M. 180 (209); and per Shepherd, J,in Srinivasa Chariar v. Raghava Chariar, (1897) I. h. R, 23 M. 28 (32). These are merely dicta and arc besides hardly consistent with the view as to the effect of 8.30, C. P. C. 6. See Radhabai v. Chimnaji, (1878) I. h. R., 3 B. 27 j Abdul Rahman v. lor Muhammad, (1881) I. L. R., 3 A. 636; Zafaryab AH v. Bakhtamir Singh, (1883) I. L. R., 5 A. 497 j Thackertey Deuraj v. Uurbum Nurtey, (1884) 1. L. R., 8 B. 432 (450); Jawahra v. Akbar Hunain, (1884) I. L. R., 7 A. 178; per Parsons, J., in fast Hassan v. Sagun Balkrirhnn, (1899) I. L. R., 24 B. 170 (176). Sec also Mohiitddin v. Sayiduddin, (1893) I. h. R., 20 C. 810 (816). But an association not incorporated will have as such no interest. See The Muhammadan Association of ileerut v. Bakshi Ram, (1884) 1. L. R., 6 A. 284. Cf. YufttjBeg v. The Board of Foreign Minfionf, (1894) I. L. R., 16 A. 429. Even if incorporated it can have no interest as worshipper. But its members may have snob, interest. 7. Baiju Lai Parbatia v. Bulak Lai Pathuk, (1897) 1. L. R., 24 C. 885 (890). 8. Kalidag Jivram v. Oor Parjaram Hirji, (1890) I L. R., 15 B. 809 (where the hereditary gors or priests were held entitled under S. ...