God Sovereign and Man Free, Or, the Doctrine of Divine Foreordination and Man's Free Agency; Stated, Illustrated, and Proved from the Scriptures Buy on Amazon
Facebook LinkedIn

God Sovereign and Man Free, Or, the Doctrine of Divine Foreordination and Man's Free Agency; Stated, Illustrated, and Proved from the Scriptures

13.48 USD

Usually ships in 24 hours

Book Details
Author(s) Nathan Lewis Rice
ISBN / ASIN 1458945979
ISBN-13 9781458945976
Availability Usually ships in 24 hours
Sales Rank #4,287,739
Marketplace United States 🇺🇸
Ratings & Reviews No reviews yet — be the first!

No reviews yet.

Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1855. Excerpt: ... CHAPTER IV. Objections To The Doctrine Of Divine Foreordination Answered, And The Inconsistencies Of Arminianism Pointed Out. The evidence appears conclusive, that, according to the Scriptures, God hath foreordained whatsoever cometh to pass. Against this doctrine, however, several objections are urged. Let us give them a careful consider ation. 1. This doctrine, it is confidently affirmed, is inconsistent with the free agency and accountability of man. Those who press this objection, must, if they are consistent, hold the doctrine of man's free ageney,--must believe that such is the nature of the human mind, that it is capable of choosing and refusing. Free Agency is nothing more nor less than acting without compulsion, and in accordance with one's desires or inclinations. The mind is free, if it is capable of considering the motives to action which may be placed before it, and of choosing its own course. The word motives is sometimes used to signify the reasons or inducements placed before the mind, tending to lead to certain choices or actions; and sometimes, to designate the feelings under which men make certain choices, or perform certain actions. Used in the former sense, that which would be a powerful motive in the view of one mind, would be no motive at all in the view of another. The offer of a bribe would be a sufficient (58)-' m 'm motive to induce one judge to decide a case contrary to law and evidence; while to another, such an offer, so far from being a motive to such a course, would be highly offensive. The temptation presented by Potiphar's wife, which was firmly resisted by Joseph, would have been a motive of sufficient power to have ruined many a youth of less purity of heart. An external motive can have no influence over the choices an...
Donate to EbookNetworking
No Prev
No Next