Alternate Assessments: Lessons Learned and Roads To Be Taken.: An article from: Exceptional Children
Book Details
PublisherCouncil for Exceptional Children
ISBN / ASINB0008HEN7G
ISBN-13978B0008HEN77
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank99,999,999
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is an article from Exceptional Children, published by Council for Exceptional Children on September 22, 2000. The length of the article is 8705 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the author: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (IDEA) require that all states develop and implement, by July 2000, alternate assessment methods for those students with disabilities who cannot be included within regular state and local district educational assessment and accountability measures. The focus of this article is how two states have addressed a set of seven essential questions in developing their alternate assessments; why they chose the formats, standards, and implementation systems that they did; and the intended and unintended consequences that have resulted thus for from those decisions. To further guide the efforts of others, a set of recommendations are provided for states and practitioners to consider in developing alternate assessments to meet the requirements of IDEA '97.
Citation Details
Title: Alternate Assessments: Lessons Learned and Roads To Be Taken.
Author: Harold L. Kleinert
Publication:Exceptional Children (Refereed)
Date: September 22, 2000
Publisher: Council for Exceptional Children
Volume: 67 Issue: 1 Page: 51
Distributed by Thomson Gale
From the author: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (IDEA) require that all states develop and implement, by July 2000, alternate assessment methods for those students with disabilities who cannot be included within regular state and local district educational assessment and accountability measures. The focus of this article is how two states have addressed a set of seven essential questions in developing their alternate assessments; why they chose the formats, standards, and implementation systems that they did; and the intended and unintended consequences that have resulted thus for from those decisions. To further guide the efforts of others, a set of recommendations are provided for states and practitioners to consider in developing alternate assessments to meet the requirements of IDEA '97.
Citation Details
Title: Alternate Assessments: Lessons Learned and Roads To Be Taken.
Author: Harold L. Kleinert
Publication:Exceptional Children (Refereed)
Date: September 22, 2000
Publisher: Council for Exceptional Children
Volume: 67 Issue: 1 Page: 51
Distributed by Thomson Gale
