Notions of fairness versus the Pareto principle: on the role of logical consistency.(response to article by Howard Chang in this issue, p. 251): An article from: Yale Law Journal
Book Details
Author(s)
Louis Kaplow, Steven Shavell
Publisher
Yale University, School of Law
ISBN / ASIN
B0008J8Y24
ISBN-13
978B0008J8Y28
Availability
Available for download now
Sales Rank
#10,984,393
Marketplace
United States 🇺🇸
Ratings & Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first!
No reviews yet.
Description
This digital document is an article from Yale Law Journal, published by Yale University, School of Law on November 1, 2000. The length of the article is 7656 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Notions of fairness versus the Pareto principle: on the role of logical consistency.(response to article by Howard Chang in this issue, p. 251)
Author: Louis Kaplow
Publication:Yale Law Journal (Refereed)
Date: November 1, 2000
Publisher: Yale University, School of Law
Volume: 110 Issue: 2 Page: 237
Distributed by Thomson Gale
Citation Details
Title: Notions of fairness versus the Pareto principle: on the role of logical consistency.(response to article by Howard Chang in this issue, p. 251)
Author: Louis Kaplow
Publication:Yale Law Journal (Refereed)
Date: November 1, 2000
Publisher: Yale University, School of Law
Volume: 110 Issue: 2 Page: 237
Distributed by Thomson Gale
