We use cookies to run the site and, with your permission, to measure how it is used. You can accept all of them or deny the ones that are not needed. Read the cookie policy.
⭐ Ratings & Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first!
No reviews yet.
📖 Description
This digital document is an article from National Tax Journal, published by National Tax Association on September 1, 1994. The length of the article is 6994 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: The health care proposals of Pres Clinton, Sen Chafee and Rep Cooper can be distinguished in part by the implementation of the health care plans through employee and individual mandates. The Clinton plan requires employers to contribute to health insurance funding but vested plan choice with individuals. The Chafee plan relies on individual mandates but still uses employers to ensure that employees are receiving coverage. The Cooper plan requires employers to make health insurance plans available but does not require employers or individuals to purchase insurance.
Citation Details Title: Implementing mandates: can we do it? (Tax Policy and the Social Agenda) Author: Robert B. Friedland Publication:National Tax Journal (Refereed) Date: September 1, 1994 Publisher: National Tax Association Volume: 47 Issue: n3 Page: 471-483