Leontief versus Ghoshian price and quantity models.: An article from: Southern Economic Journal
Book Details
Author(s)Jan Oosterhaven
PublisherSouthern Economic Association
ISBN / ASINB00093TLWG
ISBN-13978B00093TLW2
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank13,375,867
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is an article from Southern Economic Journal, published by Southern Economic Association on January 1, 1996. The length of the article is 4777 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: The Loentief and Ghoshian price models have a more negligible difference in plausibility than the two quantity models, owing to the independence of the quantity and price models. The perfect substitution and the perfect complementarity assumptions become operational when applying the quantity models, but in applications of the demand-pull price model, these are latently present but do not become operational.
Citation Details
Title: Leontief versus Ghoshian price and quantity models.
Author: Jan Oosterhaven
Publication:Southern Economic Journal (Refereed)
Date: January 1, 1996
Publisher: Southern Economic Association
Volume: v62 Issue: n3 Page: p750(10)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
From the supplier: The Loentief and Ghoshian price models have a more negligible difference in plausibility than the two quantity models, owing to the independence of the quantity and price models. The perfect substitution and the perfect complementarity assumptions become operational when applying the quantity models, but in applications of the demand-pull price model, these are latently present but do not become operational.
Citation Details
Title: Leontief versus Ghoshian price and quantity models.
Author: Jan Oosterhaven
Publication:Southern Economic Journal (Refereed)
Date: January 1, 1996
Publisher: Southern Economic Association
Volume: v62 Issue: n3 Page: p750(10)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
