Criticisms of Relational Frame Theory: implications for a behavior analytic account of derived stimulus relations.: An article from: The Psychological Record

This digital document is an article from The Psychological Record, published by Psychological Record on March 22, 1996. The length of the article is 7432 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: Two recent publications by Boelens and Sidman examined the weaknesses in Relational Frame Theory. This paper responds to those criticisms. We argue that Relational Frame Theory offers a very similar but more general account than Boelens, and that Sidman is incorrect in arguing a priori that equivalencing cannot be learned by exemplars.

Citation Details
Title: Criticisms of Relational Frame Theory: implications for a behavior analytic account of derived stimulus relations.
Author: Steven C. Hayes
Publication:The Psychological Record (Refereed)
Date: March 22, 1996
Publisher: Psychological Record
Volume: v46 Issue: n2 Page: p221(16)

Distributed by Thomson Gale