Eight mediation myths: comments from the not-so-frozen north.(Winning Without Trial)(Cover Story): An article from: Trial

This digital document is an article from Trial, published by Association of Trial Lawyers of America on June 1, 1996. The length of the article is 1623 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: Misconceptions about mediation's nature and its strengths and weaknesses prevent from using it many of those who could most benefit from it. Unlike arbitration, mediation imposes no binding decision, does not prevent later recourse to the courts, and focuses on a process rather than a result. It does indeed work, however, and produces results agreeable to both sides of a dispute, even in personal injury cases where mutual interests may be less obvious. The potential drawbacks of mediation are few, the benefits, many.

Citation Details
Title: Eight mediation myths: comments from the not-so-frozen north.(Winning Without Trial)(Cover Story)
Author: Glenn E. Cravez
Publication:Trial (Magazine/Journal)
Date: June 1, 1996
Publisher: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Volume: 32 Issue: n6 Page: 24(3)

Article Type: Cover Story

Distributed by Thomson Gale