Corporate criminal liability.(Eleventh Survey of White Collar Crime): An article from: American Criminal Law Review
Book Details
Author(s)Ann Crady
PublisherGeorgetown University Law Center
ISBN / ASINB00096KMBM
ISBN-13978B00096KMB9
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank99,999,999
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is an article from American Criminal Law Review, published by Georgetown University Law Center on March 22, 1996. The length of the article is 6804 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: Corporate criminal liability may attach for the actions of an agent when the agent is acting within the scope of employment and the actions are for the benefit of the corporation. Compliance programs do not provide a safe harbor but may be considered favorably by enforcement agencies. Infeasibility of prevention of criminal activity is not a defense to corporate criminal liability. Because criminal liability requires some intent and a corporation cannot form an intent, proving the mens rea element has required prosecutors to develop respondeat superior, willful blindness and collective knowledge theories.
Citation Details
Title: Corporate criminal liability.(Eleventh Survey of White Collar Crime)
Author: Ann Crady
Publication:American Criminal Law Review (Refereed)
Date: March 22, 1996
Publisher: Georgetown University Law Center
Volume: 33 Issue: n3 Page: 1053-1063
Distributed by Thomson Gale
From the supplier: Corporate criminal liability may attach for the actions of an agent when the agent is acting within the scope of employment and the actions are for the benefit of the corporation. Compliance programs do not provide a safe harbor but may be considered favorably by enforcement agencies. Infeasibility of prevention of criminal activity is not a defense to corporate criminal liability. Because criminal liability requires some intent and a corporation cannot form an intent, proving the mens rea element has required prosecutors to develop respondeat superior, willful blindness and collective knowledge theories.
Citation Details
Title: Corporate criminal liability.(Eleventh Survey of White Collar Crime)
Author: Ann Crady
Publication:American Criminal Law Review (Refereed)
Date: March 22, 1996
Publisher: Georgetown University Law Center
Volume: 33 Issue: n3 Page: 1053-1063
Distributed by Thomson Gale
