Privatization and political theory. (Privatization: Political and Economic Challenges): An article from: Journal of International Affairs
Book Details
ISBN / ASINB00097LHX8
ISBN-13978B00097LHX8
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank9,559,007
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is an article from Journal of International Affairs, published by Columbia University School of International Public Affairs on January 1, 1997. The length of the article is 6857 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: Privatization as an economic policy is extremely popular worldwide. Studying it helps political scientists assess the value of liberal, marxist and neo-institutionalist theories of state growth, because privatization is assumed to be the opposite of the enlargement of state function. These theories all fail to fully explain privatization. Liberalism does not explain its global popularity. Marxism cannot account for it in formerly communist countries, such as Russia. Neo-institutionalism regards the state itself as an independent variable and so cannot explain changes in state size.
Citation Details
Title: Privatization and political theory. (Privatization: Political and Economic Challenges)
Author: Harvey B. Feigenbaum
Publication:Journal of International Affairs (Refereed)
Date: January 1, 1997
Publisher: Columbia University School of International Public Affairs
Volume: v50 Issue: n2 Page: p338(18)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
From the supplier: Privatization as an economic policy is extremely popular worldwide. Studying it helps political scientists assess the value of liberal, marxist and neo-institutionalist theories of state growth, because privatization is assumed to be the opposite of the enlargement of state function. These theories all fail to fully explain privatization. Liberalism does not explain its global popularity. Marxism cannot account for it in formerly communist countries, such as Russia. Neo-institutionalism regards the state itself as an independent variable and so cannot explain changes in state size.
Citation Details
Title: Privatization and political theory. (Privatization: Political and Economic Challenges)
Author: Harvey B. Feigenbaum
Publication:Journal of International Affairs (Refereed)
Date: January 1, 1997
Publisher: Columbia University School of International Public Affairs
Volume: v50 Issue: n2 Page: p338(18)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
