On the errors associated with the use of hourly data in wind-driven rain calculations on building facades [An article from: Atmospheric Environment]

This digital document is a journal article from Atmospheric Environment, published by Elsevier in 2007. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
Wind-driven rain (WDR) is the one of the main moisture sources for building facades. It is an important factor in the dry and wet deposition of pollutants, facade surface soiling and facade erosion. WDR calculations require data records of wind speed, wind direction and horizontal rainfall intensity as input. Most meteorological datasets contain at best arithmetically averaged hourly wind and rain data. Their use is common practice in WDR calculations. As an example, existing WDR standards request at best hourly data. This paper however demonstrates that the use of such data can yield (very) large errors in the calculated WDR amounts and intensities. The reason is that arithmetic averaging on an hourly basis generally causes an important loss of information about the co-occurrence of wind and rain. An improved data averaging technique for wind and rain data is proposed that respects this co-occurrence by applying appropriate weighting factors in the averaging procedure. The performance of this technique is evaluated by WDR calculations on buildings in three cities with different climates. While arithmetically averaged hourly data yield large underestimation errors (Eindhoven, The Netherlands: 11%, Bloomington, USA: 45%, Grahamstown, South Africa: 31%), the improved averaging technique provides very good results (errors: 0%, 4%, 3%, respectively). In conclusion, WDR calculations should not be performed with arithmetically averaged hourly data. Instead, either high-resolution data (e.g. 10-min data) or hourly data that have been obtained with the proposed weighted averaging technique should be used.