Optimum take-off angle in the standing long jump [An article from: Human Movement Science]
Book Details
Author(s)M. Wakai, N.P. Linthorne
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR1QPO
ISBN-13978B000RR1QP9
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank10,432,584
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Human Movement Science, published by Elsevier in 2005. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
The aim of this study was to identify and explain the optimum projection angle that maximises the distance achieved in a standing long jump. Five physically active males performed maximum-effort jumps over a wide range of take-off angles, and the jumps were recorded and analysed using a 2-D video analysis procedure. The total jump distance achieved was considered as the sum of three component distances (take-off, flight, and landing), and the dependence of each component distance on the take-off angle was systematically investigated. The flight distance was strongly affected by a decrease in the jumper's take-off speed with increasing take-off angle, and the take-off distance and landing distance steadily decreased with increasing take-off angle due to changes in the jumper's body configuration. The optimum take-off angle for the jumper was the angle at which the three component distances combined to produce the greatest jump distance. Although the calculated optimum take-off angles (19-27^o) were lower than the jumpers' preferred take-off angles (31-39^o), the loss in jump distance through using a sub-optimum take-off angle was relatively small.
Description:
The aim of this study was to identify and explain the optimum projection angle that maximises the distance achieved in a standing long jump. Five physically active males performed maximum-effort jumps over a wide range of take-off angles, and the jumps were recorded and analysed using a 2-D video analysis procedure. The total jump distance achieved was considered as the sum of three component distances (take-off, flight, and landing), and the dependence of each component distance on the take-off angle was systematically investigated. The flight distance was strongly affected by a decrease in the jumper's take-off speed with increasing take-off angle, and the take-off distance and landing distance steadily decreased with increasing take-off angle due to changes in the jumper's body configuration. The optimum take-off angle for the jumper was the angle at which the three component distances combined to produce the greatest jump distance. Although the calculated optimum take-off angles (19-27^o) were lower than the jumpers' preferred take-off angles (31-39^o), the loss in jump distance through using a sub-optimum take-off angle was relatively small.
