The influence of the fitness evaluation method on the performance of multiobjective search algorithms [An article from: European Journal of Operational Research]

This digital document is a journal article from European Journal of Operational Research, published by Elsevier in . The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
In this paper we are concerned with finding the Pareto optimal front or a good approximation to it. Since non-dominated solutions represent the goal in multiobjective optimisation, the dominance relation is frequently used to establish preference between solutions during the search. Recently, relaxed forms of the dominance relation have been proposed in the literature for improving the performance of multiobjective search methods. This paper investigates the influence of different fitness evaluation methods on the performance of two multiobjective methodologies when applied to a highly constrained two-objective optimisation problem. The two algorithms are: the Pareto archive evolutionary strategy and a population-based annealing algorithm. We demonstrate here, on a highly constrained problem, that the method used to evaluate the fitness of candidate solutions during the search affects the performance of both algorithms and it appears that the dominance relation is not always the best method to use.