Data at the grammar-pragmatics interface: the case of resumptive pronouns in English [An article from: Lingua]
Book Details
Author(s)R. Cann, T. Kaplan, R. Kempson
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR8CCO
ISBN-13978B000RR8CC8
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank10,214,147
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Lingua, published by Elsevier in . The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
This paper explores the relation of grammaticality to acceptability through a discussion of the use of resumptive pronouns in spoken English. It is argued that undergeneration by some grammar of observed linguistic phenomena such as these is as serious a problem for theoretical frameworks as overgeneration, and that it has consequences for the way in which grammaticality and acceptability are to be construed. Using the framework of Dynamic Syntax, a theoretical account of relative clauses and anaphora construal is provided from which the use of resumptive pronouns in English emerges as a natural consequence. The fact that examples are considered by native speakers to be unacceptable in neutral contexts is argued to follow from pragmatic effects, explicable from a Relevance Theoretic perspective.
Description:
This paper explores the relation of grammaticality to acceptability through a discussion of the use of resumptive pronouns in spoken English. It is argued that undergeneration by some grammar of observed linguistic phenomena such as these is as serious a problem for theoretical frameworks as overgeneration, and that it has consequences for the way in which grammaticality and acceptability are to be construed. Using the framework of Dynamic Syntax, a theoretical account of relative clauses and anaphora construal is provided from which the use of resumptive pronouns in English emerges as a natural consequence. The fact that examples are considered by native speakers to be unacceptable in neutral contexts is argued to follow from pragmatic effects, explicable from a Relevance Theoretic perspective.
