Curbside recycling in the presence of alternatives.(Author abstract): An article from: Economic Inquiry
Book Details
PublisherThomson Gale
ISBN / ASINB000YKG37K
ISBN-13978B000YKG378
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank99,999,999
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is an article from Economic Inquiry, published by Thomson Gale on October 1, 2007. The length of the article is 11479 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the author: We measure the extent to which curbside access affects quantity recycled. We use novel data to distinguish between new recycling and material diverted from other recycling modes. We find that the marginal impact of expanding curbside programs on total recycled quantities is small, in part because curbside programs significantly cannibalize returns from drop-off recycling centers. Failure to account for cannibalization from other modes may substantially overestimate the benefits of curbside programs. We conclude with simple cost-effectiveness comparisons. Results suggest that incremental expansion of curbside access may not be cost-effective. (JEL Q53, Q58, H72)
Citation Details
Title: Curbside recycling in the presence of alternatives.(Author abstract)
Author: Timothy K.M. Beatty
Publication:Economic Inquiry (Magazine/Journal)
Date: October 1, 2007
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 45 Issue: 4 Page: 739(17)
Article Type: Author abstract
Distributed by Thomson Gale
From the author: We measure the extent to which curbside access affects quantity recycled. We use novel data to distinguish between new recycling and material diverted from other recycling modes. We find that the marginal impact of expanding curbside programs on total recycled quantities is small, in part because curbside programs significantly cannibalize returns from drop-off recycling centers. Failure to account for cannibalization from other modes may substantially overestimate the benefits of curbside programs. We conclude with simple cost-effectiveness comparisons. Results suggest that incremental expansion of curbside access may not be cost-effective. (JEL Q53, Q58, H72)
Citation Details
Title: Curbside recycling in the presence of alternatives.(Author abstract)
Author: Timothy K.M. Beatty
Publication:Economic Inquiry (Magazine/Journal)
Date: October 1, 2007
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 45 Issue: 4 Page: 739(17)
Article Type: Author abstract
Distributed by Thomson Gale
