Partisan balance and bias in network coverage of the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections.: An article from: Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media

This digital document is an article from Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, published by Broadcast Education Association on December 1, 2008. The length of the article is 7952 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: This study conceptualizes news bias as a causal factor producing systematic imbalance in the coverage of conflicting sides. Partisan bias is distinguished from structural bias by coverage that systematically favors one side with more prominence and attention. Content analysis was used to compare the television networks" balance in their treatment of Republican and Democratic candidates in stories and segments covering the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. Presidential candidates received balanced aggregate treatment in both elections. But individual networks differed in their partisan balance. CBS News consistently favored the Democratic candidate in both elections, unlike the mixed results for ABC and NBC. CBS's pattern of imbalance, especially in the 2004 election, suggests a possible political bias in its coverage.

Citation Details
Title: Partisan balance and bias in network coverage of the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections.
Author: Geri Alumit Zeldes
Publication:Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media (Magazine/Journal)
Date: December 1, 2008
Publisher: Broadcast Education Association
Volume: 52 Issue: 4 Page: 563(18)

Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning