Idi Amin & Adolf Hitler: Madman Propaganda (Powerwolf Publications Book 9)

The effectiveness of the atrocity propaganda wielded against these two influential men of history, Idi Amin and Adolf Hitler, is a product of our Judeocentric mass mind. Both of these men suffered for their respective responses to Jewry, culturally or politically. For example, world Jewish opposition to “Nazi” Germany and the subsequent boycott against German goods and services, which started in 1933, exposes Jewry (not Hitler) as instigator. Hitler retaliated in turn. Historian Ingrid Weckert, who suffered the unforgiving hand of the postwar German government for her publications exonerating Germany of 1) instigating the anti-Jewish boycott and 2) orchestrating Crystal Night, is central to this analysis. Consequently, her investigation and reports by African journalist Timothy Kalyegira provide us with our working definition of “Judeocentric mindset.” It is the inability to see events or history but from the Jewish-victim perspective.

Why Amin and Hitler?

The first thing people might ask is why compare these two men? What have they in common besides a laundry list of mindboggling atrocities? They are so different after all. They are different races. They are from different time periods. They had different interests. They are opposites, really. It is true, these men are very different; but this is why their respective victimization and demonization by Jews is so fascinating.

How could two such different men who lived at different times have been targeted by the same group of people for similar infractions against said people? Keep the following in mind as you read: Amin, a modern African leader, and Adolf Hitler, a past European leader, were both 1) popular with Zionists, and 2) targeted by Jews collectively for alleged infractions against Jews. Thus such a comparison is thought provoking for those willing to push their mind past the Jewish-victim propaganda. In this essay, we get to hear Amin’s and Hitler’s side of the story.