Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford Studies in European Law)
📄 Viewing lite version
Full site ›
Book Details
Author(s)Mitchel de S.-O.-l'E. Lasser
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN / ASIN0199575169
ISBN-139780199575169
AvailabilityUsually ships in 24 hours
Sales Rank2,006,724
CategoryLaw
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description ▲
Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the U.S. Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed comparative examination of the interpretive practice of the European Court of Justice. Lasser demonstrates that the French judicial system rests on a particularly unified institutional and ideological framework founded on explicitly republican notions of meritocracy and managerial expertise. Law-making per se may be limited to the legislature; but significant judicial normative administration is entrusted to State selected, trained, and sanctioned elites who are policed internally through hierarchical institutional structures. The American judicial system, by contrast, deploys a more participatory and democratic approach that reflects a more populist vision. Shunning the unifying, controlling, and hierarchical French structures, the American judicial system instead generates its legitimacy primarily by argumentative means. American judges engage in extensive debates that subject them to public scrutiny and control. The E.C.J. hovers delicately between the institutional/argumentative and republican/democratic extremes. On the one hand, the E.C.J. reproduces the hierarchical French discursive structure on which it was originally patterned. On the other, it transposes this structure into a transnational context of fractured political and legal assumptions. This drives the E.C.J. towards generating legitimacy by adopting a somewh
More Books in Law
Logical Form and Language
View
Covert Policing: Law and Practice
View
Legal Research and Citation: Research Process Exercise…
View
Disputing Doctors
View
Wolf and Stanley on Environmental Law
View
A Vision of American Law: Judging Law, Literature, and…
View
Property and Justice
View
Wretched Sisters (Studies in Crime and Punishment)
View
Invisible Acts of Power: Channeling Grace in Your Ever…
View