For more than five decades, we've been told by pundits, commentators, advertisers, scholars, and politicians that television is both a window on the world and a mirror reflecting our culture. We've been led to believe that it shows us the world's events through news programs and, through entertainment programs, reflects the preferences, values, beliefs, and understandings shared by most Americans. We're told that if you don't like what you see on TV, don't blame the industry, blame yourself.
This book dispels the myth that the television industry is just giving viewers the programming they want to see and, thus, we as viewers are "responsible" for the existence of shows like Fear Factor and yet another Survivor. In fact, Eileen Meehan explains, viewers exert no demand in the market for ratings, advertising slots, program production, or telecasting. She also counters the idea that TV programs reflect our culture directly. Introducing us to the political economy of television, Meehan covers programming, corporate strategies, advertising, the misnomer of "competition" among networks, and organizations that seek more industry accountability. She tells us why TV isn't our fault and who's really to blame.
Why TV Is Not Our Fault: Television Programming, Viewers, and Who's Really in Control (Critical Media Studies: Institutions, Politics, and Culture)
📄 Viewing lite version
Full site ›
Book Details
Author(s)Eileen R. Meehan
PublisherRowman & Littlefield Publishers
ISBN / ASIN0742524868
ISBN-139780742524866
AvailabilityUsually ships in 24 hours
Sales Rank1,072,610
CategoryPerforming Arts
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description ▲
More Books in Performing Arts
The Pursuit of Acting: Working Actors Share Their Expe…
View
Charlie Chaplin, Director
View
Casting a Shadow: Creating the Alfred Hitchcock Film
View
STAND UP (Methuen Drama Modern Plays)
View
The Theatre of Grotowski (Performance Books)
View
REDESIGNING WOMEN: Television after the Network Era (F…
View
The Excellent Audition Guide
View
The Language and Style of Film Criticism
View