By providing and intermediate option between "don’t shoot" and "shoot," the Task Force observes, NLW have enormous potential in the new military roles of modern combat. Wider integration of existing types of NLW into the U.S. Army and Marine Corps could have helped to reduce the damage done by widespread looting and sabotage after the cessation of major conflict in Iraq. This Independent Task Force report on Nonlethal Weapons and Capabilities finds that incorporating these and additional forms of nonlethal capabilities into the equipment, training, and doctrine of the armed services could substantially improve U.S. military effectiveness.
Nonlethal Weapons and Capabilities: Report of an Independent Task Force Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations
📄 Viewing lite version
Full site ›
Book Details
Author(s)Graham T. Allison, Paul X. Kelley
PublisherCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
ISBN / ASIN0876093411
ISBN-139780876093412
AvailabilityUsually ships in 24 hours
Sales Rank6,083,895
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description ▲
U.S. military forces, superbly capable of countering a defined enemy in intense combat, are not properly supported for important current roles as experienced in Kosovo and Iraq. If U.S. units and allied forces are to prevent looting and sabotage, control individuals and crowds, stop uncooperative vehicles in an urban environment, and protect themselves in stabilization and reconstruction activities, they will require new tools and proper training to accomplish these objectives without harming innocent people or destroying civil infrastructure. Had more of the current nonlethal weapons (NLW)—including nets to entangle and stop vehicles, slippery spray, rubber-ball projectiles, and electroconvulsive weapons such as the Taser—been available for use by military and security forces, such events could have been minimized or perhaps even avoided.