Search Books

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) vs. systematic desensitization in treatment of mathematics anxiety.: An article from: The Psychological Record

Author Robert D. Zettle
Publisher Psychological Record
📄 Viewing lite version Full site ›
🌎 Shop on Amazon — choose country
5.95 USD
🛒 Buy New on Amazon 🇺🇸

✓ Available for download now

Share:
Book Details
ISBN / ASINB0008DH5WU
ISBN-13978B0008DH5W3
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank11,457,744
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸

Description

This digital document is an article from The Psychological Record, published by Psychological Record on March 22, 2003. The length of the article is 8441 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: College students (N 24) experiencing math anxiety were treated individually for 6 weeks with either acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) or systematic desensitization. Statistical analyses indicated significant, but equivalent, reductions in self-report measures of math and test anxiety that were maintained at 2-month follow-up. Both statistically and clinically significant decrements in trait anxiety were limited to participants treated with systematic desensitization. No improvement in mathematical skills was noted for either treatment. As expected, pretreatment levels of experiential avoidance were more strongly related to therapeutic change among participants receiving ACT, suggesting that the two interventions, although generally comparable in reducing math anxiety, may do so through different processes. Implications of the findings for further research on ACT more generally and treatment of math anxiety, in particular, are discussed.

Citation Details
Title: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) vs. systematic desensitization in treatment of mathematics anxiety.
Author: Robert D. Zettle
Publication:The Psychological Record (Refereed)
Date: March 22, 2003
Publisher: Psychological Record
Volume: 53 Issue: 2 Page: 197(19)

Distributed by Thomson Gale