Search Books

Runoff at Lloyd's wouldn't benefit anyone, report says.(Lloyd's of London, report by Validation Steering Group): An article from: National Underwriter Property & Casualty-Risk & Benefits Management

Author Lisa S. Howard
Publisher The National Underwriter Company
📄 Viewing lite version Full site ›
🌎 Shop on Amazon — choose country
5.95 USD
🛒 Buy New on Amazon 🇺🇸

✓ Available for download now

Share:
Book Details
ISBN / ASINB00095MTXM
ISBN-13978B00095MTX0
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank99,999,999
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸

Description

This digital document is an article from National Underwriter Property & Casualty-Risk & Benefits Management, published by The National Underwriter Company on April 15, 1996. The length of the article is 939 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: A Validation Steering Group report on Lloyd's of London said that putting the Lloyd's insurance market into run-off would unlikely benefit any particular segment of the Lloyd's community. The report pointed instead to Lloyd's reconstruction and renewal plan as a more stable approach that would give Names the chance to leave. The Validation Group, which looked at numerous proposed options, predicted that a run-off could be detrimental to Names.

Citation Details
Title: Runoff at Lloyd's wouldn't benefit anyone, report says.(Lloyd's of London, report by Validation Steering Group)
Author: Lisa S. Howard
Publication:National Underwriter Property & Casualty-Risk & Benefits Management (Magazine/Journal)
Date: April 15, 1996
Publisher: The National Underwriter Company
Issue: n16 Page: p2(2)

Distributed by Thomson Gale