Dueling actuaries: the future of Social Security.: An article from: The Masthead

This digital document is an article from The Masthead, published by National Conference of Editorial Writers on December 22, 1996. The length of the article is 620 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: The National Conference of Editorial Writers invited four Social Security experts to its Convention '96 for a debate on how the system should be viewed in the 21st century. Panelists who were for a revamp of Social Security argued that privatization is the only way to ensure enough funding for Social Security benefits. On the other hand, supporters of the system contended that privatization schemes are but a means to shuffling funds around. In light of these arguments, print journalists must be responsible in educating the public on what the future of Social Security should be.

Citation Details
Title: Dueling actuaries: the future of Social Security.
Author: Gerald L. Elsea
Publication:The Masthead (Magazine/Journal)
Date: December 22, 1996
Publisher: National Conference of Editorial Writers
Volume: v48 Issue: n4 Page: p29(1)

Distributed by Thomson Gale