This digital document is an article from Food Processing, published by Putman Media, Inc. on February 1, 1998. The length of the article is 1095 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: Determining whether to use corrugated bag-in-box intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) or rigid refillable IBCs in food manufacturing depends upon their type of applications. Corrugated bag-in-box IBCs are often used to store liquid products because of their sanitary and transport advantages, and can also be reused in certain applications. Rigid IBCs offer economic benefits and easy handling.
Citation Details
Title: IBCs: re-use or replace? (intermediate bulk containers)
Author: Linda S. Madl
Publication:Food Processing (Magazine/Journal)
Date: February 1, 1998
Publisher: Putman Media, Inc.
Volume: v59 Issue: n2 Page: p90(2)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
IBCs: re-use or replace? (intermediate bulk containers): An article from: Food Processing
📄 Viewing lite version
Full site ›
⌛ 🇨🇦 Canada pricing being fetched…
Prices will appear once fetched — usually within a few minutes.
View in:
🇺🇸 USA
Book Details
Author(s)Linda S. Madl
PublisherPutman Media, Inc.
ISBN / ASINB000985LP2
ISBN-13978B000985LP2
MarketplaceCanada 🇨🇦