Search Books

Recent work on the arrow of radiation [An article from: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics]

Author H. Price
Publisher Elsevier
📄 Viewing lite version Full site ›
🌎 Shop on Amazon — choose country
⌛ 🇮🇳 India pricing being fetched… Prices will appear once fetched — usually within a few minutes.
Share:
Book Details
Author(s)H. Price
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000P6O5LE
ISBN-13978B000P6O5L1
MarketplaceIndia 🇮🇳

Description

This digital document is a journal article from Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, published by Elsevier in 2006. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
In many physical systems, coupling forces provide a way of carrying the energy stored in adjacent harmonic oscillators from place to place, in the form of waves. The wave equations governing such phenomena are time-symmetric: they permit the opposite processes, in which energy arrives at a point in the form of incoming concentric waves, to be lost to some external system. But these processes seem rare in nature. What explains this temporal asymmetry, and how is it related to the thermodynamic asymmetry? This paper attempts to clarify these old issues, in the light of recent contributions. After brief introductory remarks (Section 1), the paper is in three main parts. Section 2 examines the so-called Sommerfeld Radiation Condition, arguing that its link to the observed asymmetry is much less direct than commonly supposed. Section 3 begins with Zeh's proposal to make the Sommerfeld condition an ingredient in an explanation of the observed asymmetry, and makes explicit a useful distinction between two ways in which the thermodynamic asymmetry might connect to the radiation asymmetry. Section 4 reviews a proposal I have defended in earlier work about the relation of the radiative asymmetry to that of thermodynamics, and defends it against recent objections by Zeh and Frisch. I also distinguish it from a recent proposal due to North. I agree with North that the observed asymmetry of radiation stems from the low-entropy history, but argue that she mis-characterises the asymmetry, and hence misses a crucial element in a proper account of the role of the low-entropy past.