Search Books

Evaluating the physical capture method of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism for comparison of soil microbial communities [An article from: Soil Biology and Biochemistry]

Author C.B. Blackwood, J.S. Buyer
Publisher Elsevier
📄 Viewing lite version Full site ›
🌎 Shop on Amazon — choose country
10.95 USD
🛒 Buy New on Amazon 🇺🇸

✓ Available for download now

Share:
Book Details
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000PC0KB2
ISBN-13978B000PC0KB2
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸

Description

This digital document is a journal article from Soil Biology and Biochemistry, published by Elsevier in 2007. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) is a popular method of comparative microbial community analysis which is normally accomplished by tagging terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) with a fluorescent primer. Here, we evaluate an alternative method of T-RFLP where T-RFs are physically captured using a biotinylated primer and streptavidin-coated beads. This eliminates one of the primary criticisms of T-RFLP, namely that T-RFs cannot be identified by sequence analysis, and also represents an alternative method for collecting T-RFLP profiles. Microbial communities from forest, agricultural, and turf soils were investigated using several sets of primers specific for different microbial groups. The physical capture method of T-RFLP resulted in similar profiles to those generated by fluorescent T-RFLP. The relationships among ecosystem types captured by both methods and revealed by ordination were virtually identical. The total variance in the profiles that was attributed to ecosystem type was approximately equal, or greater, when generated by the physical capture method, depending on the primers used. However, physical capture T-RFLP resolved fewer T-RFs than fluorescent T-RFLP, and this may reduce the sensitivity to changes in non-dominant populations within the community. Direct cloning and sequencing of physical capture T-RFs revealed that most bands were not comprised of sequences related to those in the database that would generate T-RFs of similar size. T-RFs should therefore be identified by sequencing, rather than by comparing the sizes of T-RFs to computer digests of database sequences. Physical capture T-RFLP should be a useful tool to identify T-RFs by sequencing, and for laboratories without economical access to equipment required to perform fluorescent T-RFLP.