Search Books

Gender differences on the mental rotations test: a factor analysis [An article from: Acta Psychologica]

Author D. Voyer, K.A. Saunders
Publisher Elsevier
📄 Viewing lite version Full site ›
🌎 Shop on Amazon — choose country
5.95 USD
🛒 Buy New on Amazon 🇺🇸

✓ Available for download now

Share:
Book Details
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR0CUY
ISBN-13978B000RR0CU2
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸

Description

This digital document is a journal article from Acta Psychologica, published by Elsevier in 2004. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
The purpose of the present study was to examine possible gender differences in strategy when completing the mental rotations test. Two experiments examined gender differences and the factor structure on outcomes that can be obtained on this test. Experiment 1 involved large groups testing and Experiment 2 used small groups. Factor analytic results in both experiments generally supported the notion that items with one wrong and one blank response or one correct and one blank reflect reluctance to guess, whereas one correct and one wrong or two wrong answers reflect propensity to guess. Even though the factor structure was the same in males and females, the data provided mitigated support for the hypothesis that males have a higher propensity to guess and females show a greater reluctance to guess. Findings are discussed in terms of their implications for the interpretation of gender differences on the MRT.