Search Books

The effects of uncertainty in error monitoring on associated ERPs [An article from: Brain and Cognition]

Author P.E. Pailing, S.J. Segalowitz
Publisher Elsevier
📄 Viewing lite version Full site ›
🌎 Shop on Amazon — choose country
5.95 USD
🛒 Buy New on Amazon 🇺🇸

✓ Available for download now

Share:
Book Details
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR0LGY
ISBN-13978B000RR0LG2
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸

Description

This digital document is a journal article from Brain and Cognition, published by Elsevier in 2004. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
A series of experiments were conducted to address the effect of uncertainty regarding performance for predicting the likelihood of a correct-response negativity (CRN) in addition to error-related negativity (ERN). In Study 1, 18 healthy young adults completed letter discrimination tasks during single and dual attention conditions designed to manipulate response certainty. In the second study, the same participants completed easy and difficult tone discrimination tasks designed to influence stimulus certainty. In the third study, task difficulty was manipulated to produce different error rates without altering certainty. Studies 1 and 2 indicated that error and correct responses are processed more similarly when uncertainty is present (i.e., ERN~CRN). Furthermore, uncertainty was associated with attenuation of the ERN and enhancement of the CRN, consistent with an error detection hypothesis. Study 3 indicated that task difficulty alone does not influence the ERN or likelihood of a CRN. These results offer support for the error detection account of the ERN and establish the role of uncertainty in predicting the CRN, as postulated by Scheffers and Coles (2000).