Re-justifying the fair cross section requirement: equal representation and enfranchisement in the American criminal jury.: An article from: Yale Law Journal

This digital document is an article from Yale Law Journal, published by Thomson Gale on May 1, 2007. The length of the article is 21195 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: This Note proposes a new justification for the fair cross section (FCS) requirement governing criminal jury composition. While the Supreme Court has defended the requirement by invoking demographic conceptions of the jury's legitimacy, many scholars have observed that this approach is at odds with contemporary jury law and practice. This Note argues that courts should instead defend the FCS requirement as a means of ensuring that eligible participants are included in the jury franchise. Besides solving an intractable doctrinal puzzle, an enfranchisement-based approach draws attention to ways in which widespread juror selection practices exclude underrepresented groups and thereby undermine the jury's democratic character.

Citation Details
Title: Re-justifying the fair cross section requirement: equal representation and enfranchisement in the American criminal jury.
Author: Richard M. Re
Publication:Yale Law Journal (Magazine/Journal)
Date: May 1, 2007
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 116 Issue: 7 Page: 1568(47)

Distributed by Thomson Gale