Rethinking criminal law and family status.: An article from: Yale Law Journal

This digital document is an article from Yale Law Journal, published by Yale University, School of Law on June 1, 2010. The length of the article is 18114 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: In our recent book, Privilege or Punish: Criminal Justice and the Challenge of Family Ties, we examined and critiqued a number of ways in which the criminal justice system uses family status to distribute benefits or burdens to defendants. In their essays, Professors Alafair Burke, Alice Ristroph, and Melissa Murray identify a series of concerns with the framework we offer policymakers to analyze these family ties benefits or burdens. We think it worthwhile not only to clarify where those challenges rest on misunderstandings or confusions about the central features of our views, but also to show the deficiencies of the proposed alternatives. While we appreciate and admire the efforts of our critics to advance this important conversation, we hope this Essay will illuminate why the normative framework of Privilege or Punish remains a more helpful structure to policymakers assessing how family status should intersect with the criminal law within a liberal democracy such as our own.

Citation Details
Title: Rethinking criminal law and family status.
Author: Dan Markel
Publication:Yale Law Journal (Magazine/Journal)
Date: June 1, 2010
Publisher: Yale University, School of Law
Volume: 119 Issue: 8 Page: 1864(40)

Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning