The economic crisis has had a significant and detrimental impact on Europe’s defense capability. Defense budgets in the Persian Gulf, East and South Asia, and Russia are growing enormously, often by double-digit margins, while Europe is on the brink of falling into military irrelevance. Only a small number of European armed forces are available for deployment, and this percentage falls below the usability target set by NATO and accepted by the EU. NATO’s main task — to reassure member states and to deter enemies — requires that allies have military forces of a certain minimum quality and quantity. If the gap between NATO’s ambitions and its available means grows wide, the alliance’s credibility suffers and the solidarity is undermined. NATO and EU, as well as member nations individually, have a lot to bring into the defense debate. The EU summit on security and defense in December 2013 could help lay groundwork for building a strong Europe, which above all requires strong political will. Clearly, it will take a lot to persuade European populations of the continuing relevance of defense when other challenges seem so much more immediate and important. Nevertheless, the EU and NATO politicians should make a better effort in building a narrative that helps to assure people why stronger defense is in their interest.
This paper describes the challenges that Europe faces and analyses how this affects the transatlantic security relationship. It then recommends ways to maintain support for the transatlantic alliance in the United States, outlines the European Union’s opportunity to reinvigorate the defense debate, and suggests a broader and stronger strategic narrative to explain why defense issues still matter.
Exit Venus: Europe Needs to be Stronger about Defense (Foreign Policy)
📄 Viewing lite version
Full site ›
⌛ 🇫🇷 France pricing being fetched…
Prices will appear once fetched — usually within a few minutes.
View in:
🇺🇸 USA