We use cookies to run the site and, with your permission, to measure how it is used. You can accept all of them or deny the ones that are not needed. Read the cookie policy.
⭐ Ratings & Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first!
No reviews yet.
📖 Description
In this provocative book, a professor of philosophy examines the arguments for and against euthanasia, analyzes specific case studies, including those of Baby Jane Doe and Barney Clark, and offers an alternate theory on the morality of euthanasia. Various traditional distinctions--between "human" and "non-human," intentional and nonintentional, killing and "letting die"--are taken into account to determine whether euthanasia is permissible or not. Rachels presents a systematic argument against the traditional view, defending an alternative position based on the belief that there is a profound difference between having a life and merely being alive.