Criminal Procedure: Adjudication

<p> Combining first-hand knowledge of the criminal procedure system with stellar constitutional law scholarship, Levenson and Chemerinsky now offer a free-standing and student-friendly casebook that focuses on the adjudication phase of criminal procedure. </p><p><b>Written in the eminently articulate style that characterizes Chemerinsky’s Constitutional Law casebook, <i>Criminal Procedure: Adjudication</i> offers:</b></p><ul><li><b>straightforward essays</b> by the authors that illuminate principal and minor cases </li><li><b>a first-chapter overview of criminal procedure</b> that looks at: <ul><li> the roles of the participants </li><li> the progression of a case through the system </li><li> key procedural rules and governing principles </li><li> the Incorporation Doctrine </li><li> the test for determining when new procedural rules should be applied retroactively </li></ul></li><li><b>a consistent and systematic chapter structure that:</b><ul><li> introduces the topic </li><li> discusses the history and development of the law </li><li> cites examples from recent cases where the key issues have been raised </li><li> offers an analytic critique of the resolution of the issues </li></ul></li><li><b>chronologically organized chapter topics</b> that mirror the sequential ordering of the adjudication process </li><li><b>samples of legal pleadings</b> that exemplify attorneys’ actual arguments </li><li><b>a panoramic perspective on practice</b> as conveyed through the eyes of prosecutors, defense counsel, judges, police, and victims </li><li><b>Supreme Court cases from the 2006-2007 term</b></li><li><b>a detailed Teacher’s Manual</b> that offers questions and answers to support teaching and fuel class discussion </li><li><b>an expanded teaching package</b> that includes <b>PowerPoint slides</b>, a <b> DVD</b> that presents the facts and backgrounds of several key cases, and an <b> author website</b></li></ul><p> Sure, it is a pleasure to teach and to read, but you could decide to adopt it simply for the wealth of experience and expertise that <b>Chemerinsky</b> and <b> Levenson</b> bring to their subject. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>