ABC Using Articulated Thought Disputationto Enhance the Effects of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
Out of Print--Limited Availability.
Book Details
Author(s)
Cornwall, Michael
Publisher
CREATESPACE
ISBN / ASIN
1456510290
ISBN-13
9781456510299
Availability
Out of Print--Limited Availability.
Category
Paperback
Marketplace
United States 🇺🇸
Description
Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) is a unified theory of psychotherapy, focusing on the examination of attitudes and beliefs as the basis for enhancing competence in Social Problem Solving (SPS). The therapist's dexterity at implementing the level of assimilative integration required for the client's effective use of REBT, however, may result in therapeutic failures.
This study investigated the use of Articulated Thought Disputation (ATD) as a way addressing the perceived weaknesses in the model's transferability from the clinical to real world experiences. Thirty-five participants, ranging in age from 18-66, participated in the study. Twenty-two (68.8%) were Female and 10 (31.3%) were Male. Three individuals declined to provide demographic information. Twenty-eight European Americans (87.5%) and four African Americans (12.5%) participated. Results showed an improvement in the training group's SPS at Post-test (M = 108.29, SD = 12.25) compared to Pre-test (M = 100.29, SD = 13.97). An ANOVA failed to reveal a significant between-subjects main effect by Group, F (1, 33) = 0.00, p > .05 (partial ï¨2 = .00, power = .05). This suggests that there was no overall difference between the training and control groups on Problem Solving. There was an overall main effect by Time. This increase was significant only for the Training group. Improvement did not differ by Age of Sex on Post-test scores. An assumption could be drawn that a continual increase in Social Problem Solving scores may have been realized, if the study had continued for a longer period of Time.
You may want to check out my book Go Suck A Lemon. It is a practical guide to using REBT. I am planning a follow up that will focus exclusively on the use of articulated thought disputation.
Join me on my Blog at eitheory.com
This study investigated the use of Articulated Thought Disputation (ATD) as a way addressing the perceived weaknesses in the model's transferability from the clinical to real world experiences. Thirty-five participants, ranging in age from 18-66, participated in the study. Twenty-two (68.8%) were Female and 10 (31.3%) were Male. Three individuals declined to provide demographic information. Twenty-eight European Americans (87.5%) and four African Americans (12.5%) participated. Results showed an improvement in the training group's SPS at Post-test (M = 108.29, SD = 12.25) compared to Pre-test (M = 100.29, SD = 13.97). An ANOVA failed to reveal a significant between-subjects main effect by Group, F (1, 33) = 0.00, p > .05 (partial ï¨2 = .00, power = .05). This suggests that there was no overall difference between the training and control groups on Problem Solving. There was an overall main effect by Time. This increase was significant only for the Training group. Improvement did not differ by Age of Sex on Post-test scores. An assumption could be drawn that a continual increase in Social Problem Solving scores may have been realized, if the study had continued for a longer period of Time.
You may want to check out my book Go Suck A Lemon. It is a practical guide to using REBT. I am planning a follow up that will focus exclusively on the use of articulated thought disputation.
Join me on my Blog at eitheory.com
