Eyewitness to Genocide: The Operation Reinhard Death Camp Trials, 1955-1966 (Legacies of War) Buy on Amazon

https://www.ebooknetworking.net/books_detail-1621900495.html

Eyewitness to Genocide: The Operation Reinhard Death Camp Trials, 1955-1966 (Legacies of War)

63.50 GBP
Buy New on Amazon 🇬🇧 Buy Used — £55.60

Usually dispatched within 24 hours

Book Details

ISBN / ASIN1621900495
ISBN-139781621900498
AvailabilityUsually dispatched within 24 hours
Sales Rank2,098,833
CategoryHistory
MarketplaceUnited Kingdom  🇬🇧

Description

One of the deadliest phases of the Holocaust, the Nazi regime's "Operation Reinhard" produced three major death camps--Belzec, Treblinka, and Sobibor--which claimed the lives of 1.8 million Jews. In the 1960s, a small measure of justice came for those victims when a score of defendants who had been officers and guards at the camps were convicted of war crimes in West German courts. The conviction rates varied, however. While all but one of fourteen Treblinka defendants were convicted, half of the twelve Sobibor defendants escaped punishment, and only one of eight Belzec defendants was convicted. Also, despite the enormity of the crimes, the sentences were light in many cases, amounting to only a few years in prison. In this meticulous history of the Operation Reinhard trials, Michael S. Bryant examines a disturbing question: Did compromised jurists engineer acquittals or lenient punishments for proven killers? Drawing on rarely studied archival sources, Bryant concludes that the trial judges acted in good faith within the bounds of West German law. The key to successful prosecutions was eyewitness testimony. At Belzec, the near-total efficiency of the Nazi death machine meant that only one survivor could be found to testify. At Treblinka and Sobibor, however, prisoner revolts had resulted in a number of survivors who could give firsthand accounts of specific atrocities and identify participants. The courts, Bryant finds, treated these witnesses with respect and even made allowances for conflicting testimony. And when handing down sentences, the judges acted in accordance with strict legal definitions of perpetration, complicity, and action under duress. Yet, despite these findings, Bryant also shows that West German legal culture was hardly blameless during the postwar era. Though ready to convict the mostly workingclass personnel of the death camps, the Federal Republic followed policies that insulated the judicial elite from accountability for its own role in
Donate to EbookNetworking
Prev
Next