Meta-Analysis of Social Relationships and Posttreatment Drinking Outcomes: Comparison of Relationship Structure, Function and Quality(*).(Statistical Data ... article from: Journal of Studies on Alcohol
Book Details
Author(s)Martha C. Beattie
PublisherAlcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
ISBN / ASINB0008I94SS
ISBN-13978B0008I94S7
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is an article from Journal of Studies on Alcohol, published by Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc. on July 1, 2001. The length of the article is 7794 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the author: Objective: Alcoholism treatment programs are recognizing the importance of social relationships by addressing interpersonal as well as intrapersonal factors in treatment. This shift in treatment orientation is occurring, however, in the absence of extensive information on the magnitude of the relationship between interpersonal factors and drinking outcomes. This article examines the association between alcoholism treatment drinking outcomes and social relationships. Method: Studies of the relationship between drinking outcomes and social relationships reported from 1965 to 1996 were coded for inclusion in this study. Analysis was a conceptually based meta-analytic review and synthesis of some of these findings. Through illustration, the manner in which components of social relationships (structure, function and quality) are associated with drinking outcomes was analyzed. Results: Marital status, a structural construct, was less strongly correlated with drinking outcomes (average r = 0.11) than was social support, a functional construct (average r = 0.22) or marital and family adjustment, a construct indicative of quality (average r = 0.17). Marital status was more strongly related to drinking outcomes for men than for women, whereas having significant others in treatment predicted stronger relationships between drinking outcomes and both social support and marital/family adjustment for both genders. Conclusions: The effect of social relationships on drinking outcomes is variable, inconsistent and weak. That this is not the case for some subpopulations and constructs encourages us to continue the examination of these complex interrelationships. (J. Stud. Alcohol 62: 518-527, 2001)
Citation Details
Title: Meta-Analysis of Social Relationships and Posttreatment Drinking Outcomes: Comparison of Relationship Structure, Function and Quality(*).(Statistical Data Included)
Author: Martha C. Beattie
Publication:Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Refereed)
Date: July 1, 2001
Publisher: Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
Volume: 62 Issue: 4 Page: 518
Article Type: Statistical Data Included
Distributed by Thomson Gale
From the author: Objective: Alcoholism treatment programs are recognizing the importance of social relationships by addressing interpersonal as well as intrapersonal factors in treatment. This shift in treatment orientation is occurring, however, in the absence of extensive information on the magnitude of the relationship between interpersonal factors and drinking outcomes. This article examines the association between alcoholism treatment drinking outcomes and social relationships. Method: Studies of the relationship between drinking outcomes and social relationships reported from 1965 to 1996 were coded for inclusion in this study. Analysis was a conceptually based meta-analytic review and synthesis of some of these findings. Through illustration, the manner in which components of social relationships (structure, function and quality) are associated with drinking outcomes was analyzed. Results: Marital status, a structural construct, was less strongly correlated with drinking outcomes (average r = 0.11) than was social support, a functional construct (average r = 0.22) or marital and family adjustment, a construct indicative of quality (average r = 0.17). Marital status was more strongly related to drinking outcomes for men than for women, whereas having significant others in treatment predicted stronger relationships between drinking outcomes and both social support and marital/family adjustment for both genders. Conclusions: The effect of social relationships on drinking outcomes is variable, inconsistent and weak. That this is not the case for some subpopulations and constructs encourages us to continue the examination of these complex interrelationships. (J. Stud. Alcohol 62: 518-527, 2001)
Citation Details
Title: Meta-Analysis of Social Relationships and Posttreatment Drinking Outcomes: Comparison of Relationship Structure, Function and Quality(*).(Statistical Data Included)
Author: Martha C. Beattie
Publication:Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Refereed)
Date: July 1, 2001
Publisher: Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
Volume: 62 Issue: 4 Page: 518
Article Type: Statistical Data Included
Distributed by Thomson Gale
