Effect of stimulant medication on children with attention deficit disorder: a "review of reviews.": An article from: Exceptional Children
Book Details
PublisherCouncil for Exceptional Children
ISBN / ASINB00092TMKI
ISBN-13978B00092TMK3
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank9,764,228
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is an article from Exceptional Children, published by Council for Exceptional Children on October 1, 1993. The length of the article is 4985 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the author: The University of California, Irvine ADD Center recently conducted a synthesis of the literature on the use of stimulants with children with attention deficit disorder (ADD), using a unique "review of reviews" methodology. In this article, we compare three reviews from each of three review types (traditional, meta-analytic, general audience) and illustrate how coding variables can highlight sources of divergence. In general, divergent conclusions stemmed from variations in goal rather than from variations in the sources selected to review. Across quantitativ reviews, the average effect size for symptomatic improvement (.83) was twice that for benefits on IQ and achievement measures (.35). A summary of what should and should not be expected of the use of stimulants with ADD children, derived from the literature synthesis, is provided.
Citation Details
Title: Effect of stimulant medication on children with attention deficit disorder: a "review of reviews."
Author: James M. Swanson
Publication:Exceptional Children (Refereed)
Date: October 1, 1993
Publisher: Council for Exceptional Children
Volume: v60 Issue: n2 Page: p154(9)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
From the author: The University of California, Irvine ADD Center recently conducted a synthesis of the literature on the use of stimulants with children with attention deficit disorder (ADD), using a unique "review of reviews" methodology. In this article, we compare three reviews from each of three review types (traditional, meta-analytic, general audience) and illustrate how coding variables can highlight sources of divergence. In general, divergent conclusions stemmed from variations in goal rather than from variations in the sources selected to review. Across quantitativ reviews, the average effect size for symptomatic improvement (.83) was twice that for benefits on IQ and achievement measures (.35). A summary of what should and should not be expected of the use of stimulants with ADD children, derived from the literature synthesis, is provided.
Citation Details
Title: Effect of stimulant medication on children with attention deficit disorder: a "review of reviews."
Author: James M. Swanson
Publication:Exceptional Children (Refereed)
Date: October 1, 1993
Publisher: Council for Exceptional Children
Volume: v60 Issue: n2 Page: p154(9)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
