Good science, weird reporting. (Washington Post's misleading report about ozone depletion undermines environmental concerns) (Column): An article from: E
Book Details
Author(s)Andre Carothers
PublisherEarth Action Network, Inc.
ISBN / ASINB00092TZRI
ISBN-13978B00092TZR3
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is an article from E, published by Earth Action Network, Inc. on December 1, 1993. The length of the article is 719 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: Washington Post reporter Boyce Rensberger attempted in spring 1993 to join an alarming group of scientific critics who say there is insufficient evidence to support claims of ozone depletion. The problem is that scientists do agree ozone depletion is happening, even if at a slow rate.
Citation Details
Title: Good science, weird reporting. (Washington Post's misleading report about ozone depletion undermines environmental concerns) (Column)
Author: Andre Carothers
Publication:E (Magazine/Journal)
Date: December 1, 1993
Publisher: Earth Action Network, Inc.
Volume: v4 Issue: n6 Page: p72(1)
Article Type: Column
Distributed by Thomson Gale
From the supplier: Washington Post reporter Boyce Rensberger attempted in spring 1993 to join an alarming group of scientific critics who say there is insufficient evidence to support claims of ozone depletion. The problem is that scientists do agree ozone depletion is happening, even if at a slow rate.
Citation Details
Title: Good science, weird reporting. (Washington Post's misleading report about ozone depletion undermines environmental concerns) (Column)
Author: Andre Carothers
Publication:E (Magazine/Journal)
Date: December 1, 1993
Publisher: Earth Action Network, Inc.
Volume: v4 Issue: n6 Page: p72(1)
Article Type: Column
Distributed by Thomson Gale
