Good science, weird reporting. (Washington Post's misleading report about ozone depletion undermines environmental concerns) (Column): An article from: E Buy on Amazon
Facebook LinkedIn

Good science, weird reporting. (Washington Post's misleading report about ozone depletion undermines environmental concerns) (Column): An article from: E

5.95 USD

Available for download now

Book Details
Author(s) Andre Carothers
ISBN / ASIN B00092TZRI
ISBN-13 978B00092TZR3
Availability Available for download now
Marketplace United States 🇺🇸
Ratings & Reviews No reviews yet — be the first!

No reviews yet.

Description
This digital document is an article from E, published by Earth Action Network, Inc. on December 1, 1993. The length of the article is 719 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: Washington Post reporter Boyce Rensberger attempted in spring 1993 to join an alarming group of scientific critics who say there is insufficient evidence to support claims of ozone depletion. The problem is that scientists do agree ozone depletion is happening, even if at a slow rate.

Citation Details
Title: Good science, weird reporting. (Washington Post's misleading report about ozone depletion undermines environmental concerns) (Column)
Author: Andre Carothers
Publication:E (Magazine/Journal)
Date: December 1, 1993
Publisher: Earth Action Network, Inc.
Volume: v4 Issue: n6 Page: p72(1)

Article Type: Column

Distributed by Thomson Gale
Donate to EbookNetworking
No Prev
No Next