The IDEA's least restrictive environment mandate: legal implications. (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act): An article from: Exceptional Children
Book Details
PublisherCouncil for Exceptional Children
ISBN / ASINB00092VJH2
ISBN-13978B00092VJH3
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank11,987,809
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is an article from Exceptional Children, published by Council for Exceptional Children on September 1, 1994. The length of the article is 6010 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the author: ABSTRACT: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) states that students with disabilities are to be provided with a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment (LRE). During the early years of the IDEA, the courts generally deferred to school officials on LRE matters and ruled in favor of more restrictive placements. In some recent cases, however, courts have taken a more activist stance. These decisions may signal a new era in LRE case law. Nineteen years after the passage of P.L. 94-142, the courts may be growing impatient with school officials for not providing less restrictive environments for students with disabilities.
Citation Details
Title: The IDEA's least restrictive environment mandate: legal implications. (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act)
Author: Allan G., Jr. Osborne
Publication:Exceptional Children (Refereed)
Date: September 1, 1994
Publisher: Council for Exceptional Children
Volume: v61 Issue: n1 Page: p6(9)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
From the author: ABSTRACT: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) states that students with disabilities are to be provided with a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment (LRE). During the early years of the IDEA, the courts generally deferred to school officials on LRE matters and ruled in favor of more restrictive placements. In some recent cases, however, courts have taken a more activist stance. These decisions may signal a new era in LRE case law. Nineteen years after the passage of P.L. 94-142, the courts may be growing impatient with school officials for not providing less restrictive environments for students with disabilities.
Citation Details
Title: The IDEA's least restrictive environment mandate: legal implications. (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act)
Author: Allan G., Jr. Osborne
Publication:Exceptional Children (Refereed)
Date: September 1, 1994
Publisher: Council for Exceptional Children
Volume: v61 Issue: n1 Page: p6(9)
Distributed by Thomson Gale

