Industry lawyers react defiantly to Dow verdict.(Dow Corning Corp.'s victory in product liability insurance case linked to faulty breast implants): An ... & Casualty-Risk & Benefits Management

This digital document is an article from National Underwriter Property & Casualty-Risk & Benefits Management, published by The National Underwriter Company on February 26, 1996. The length of the article is 1254 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: Dow Corning's victory in a product liability insurance case linked to faulty breast implants is by no means assured, according to lawyers for the property-casualty insurance companies that lost the case. At the heart of the case, Dow Corning v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity, was a disputed $400 million in insurance coverage. Lawyers for Hartford Accident and 29 other insurers claim that the jury did not understand the issues at hand and intimate that an appeal is being contemplated. Lawyers for Dow Corning said that the verdict is a warning to insurers to not deny legitimate claims.

Citation Details
Title: Industry lawyers react defiantly to Dow verdict.(Dow Corning Corp.'s victory in product liability insurance case linked to faulty breast implants)
Author: Susanne Sclafane
Publication:National Underwriter Property & Casualty-Risk & Benefits Management (Magazine/Journal)
Date: February 26, 1996
Publisher: The National Underwriter Company
Issue: n9 Page: p6(1)

Distributed by Thomson Gale