Med-arb: mediation with a bite and an effective ADR model. (alternative dispute resolution): An article from: Defense Counsel Journal

This digital document is an article from Defense Counsel Journal, published by International Association of Defense Counsels on April 1, 1996. The length of the article is 4590 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: The med-arb hybrid of mediation and arbitration combines afconsensual bargaining phase with a final judgement if an agreement cannot be reached. Though this method is not perfect for all situations, it can provide benefits for appropriate cases in that it is flexible, final, efficient, expedient and private. Participants should be of equal bargaining experience to prevent manipulation, making the technique most appropriate for contract negotiation disputes. Critics are concerned about bias during the mediation phase and the relationship change between mediator and arbitrator.

Citation Details
Title: Med-arb: mediation with a bite and an effective ADR model. (alternative dispute resolution)
Author: Sherry Landry
Publication:Defense Counsel Journal (Refereed)
Date: April 1, 1996
Publisher: International Association of Defense Counsels
Volume: 63 Issue: n2 Page: 263-269

Distributed by Thomson Gale