Leader-member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes [An article from: The Leadership Quarterly]
Book Details
Author(s)K. Boies, J.M. Howell
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000PA9S8A
ISBN-13978B000PA9S81
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank7,683,714
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is a journal article from The Leadership Quarterly, published by Elsevier in 2006. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
The purpose of this study was to examine the interaction between mean level of LMX and the differentiation of LMX relationships within a team to explain team potency and team conflict. Hypotheses were tested in a team-based organization, the Canadian Forces. Soldiers (N=162), who were members of 35 military teams, completed questionnaires assessing the different variables. All analyses were conducted at the team level. As expected, mean LMX within teams was positively related to team potency and negatively related to team conflict. Furthermore, mean LMX interacted with relationship differentiation within teams to explain team potency and team conflict. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for LMX theory and leadership practice.
Description:
The purpose of this study was to examine the interaction between mean level of LMX and the differentiation of LMX relationships within a team to explain team potency and team conflict. Hypotheses were tested in a team-based organization, the Canadian Forces. Soldiers (N=162), who were members of 35 military teams, completed questionnaires assessing the different variables. All analyses were conducted at the team level. As expected, mean LMX within teams was positively related to team potency and negatively related to team conflict. Furthermore, mean LMX interacted with relationship differentiation within teams to explain team potency and team conflict. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for LMX theory and leadership practice.
