Effect of data length on rainfall-runoff modelling [An article from: Environmental Modelling and Software]
Book Details
Author(s)W.C. Boughton
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000PAUUW8
ISBN-13978B000PAUUW2
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank10,691,034
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Environmental Modelling and Software, published by Elsevier in 2007. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
A 64-year data set of daily rainfall and runoff, and average monthly potential evapotranspiration (PET) was split into subsets of 2, 5, 10, 20 and 30 years. Each subset was used to calibrate the AWBM daily rainfall-runoff model. Each subset calibration was then used to estimate runoff from the 64 years of rainfall and PET data. The ratios of calculated to actual total runoff were used to determine the ranges of error from the different lengths of data used for calibration. There was little difference in results from the 2- and 5-year subsets with 90% of estimates of long term runoff in the range of -21% to +31% of the recorded value. Overestimation of long term runoff reduced with length of calibration data of 10 or more years; however, the chances of underestimating were only slightly reduced even with 30 years of calibration data. Some limited repetition of the calculations with the Curve Number rainfall-runoff model indicated that the error characteristics were inherent in the data set and not an artifact of the model used. The ramifications for applications of rainfall-runoff modelling are briefly discussed.
Description:
A 64-year data set of daily rainfall and runoff, and average monthly potential evapotranspiration (PET) was split into subsets of 2, 5, 10, 20 and 30 years. Each subset was used to calibrate the AWBM daily rainfall-runoff model. Each subset calibration was then used to estimate runoff from the 64 years of rainfall and PET data. The ratios of calculated to actual total runoff were used to determine the ranges of error from the different lengths of data used for calibration. There was little difference in results from the 2- and 5-year subsets with 90% of estimates of long term runoff in the range of -21% to +31% of the recorded value. Overestimation of long term runoff reduced with length of calibration data of 10 or more years; however, the chances of underestimating were only slightly reduced even with 30 years of calibration data. Some limited repetition of the calculations with the Curve Number rainfall-runoff model indicated that the error characteristics were inherent in the data set and not an artifact of the model used. The ramifications for applications of rainfall-runoff modelling are briefly discussed.
