![The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ... Paradox' [An article from: Research Policy]](https://www.ebooknetworking.net/books/B00/0PC/bigB000PC0H06.jpg)
The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ... Paradox' [An article from: Research Policy]
Book Details
Author(s)G. Dosi, P. Llerena, M.S. Labini
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000PC0H06
ISBN-13978B000PC0H02
MarketplaceFrance 🇫🇷
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Research Policy, published by Elsevier in 2006. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
This paper discusses, first, the properties of scientific and technological knowledge and the institutions supporting its generation and its economic applications. The evidence supports the broad interpretation that we call the 'Stanford-Yale-Sussex' synthesis. Second, such patterns yield important implications with respect to the so-called 'European Paradox', i.e. the conjecture that EU countries play a leading global role in terms of top-level scientific output, but lag behind in the ability of converting this strength into wealth-generating innovations. Some descriptive evidence shows that, contrary to the 'paradox' conjecture, Europe's weaknesses reside both in its system of scientific research and in a relatively weak industry. The final part of the paper identifies a few normative implications: much less emphasis should be put on various types of 'networking', and much more on policy measures aimed at strengthening both frontier research and European corporate actors.
Description:
This paper discusses, first, the properties of scientific and technological knowledge and the institutions supporting its generation and its economic applications. The evidence supports the broad interpretation that we call the 'Stanford-Yale-Sussex' synthesis. Second, such patterns yield important implications with respect to the so-called 'European Paradox', i.e. the conjecture that EU countries play a leading global role in terms of top-level scientific output, but lag behind in the ability of converting this strength into wealth-generating innovations. Some descriptive evidence shows that, contrary to the 'paradox' conjecture, Europe's weaknesses reside both in its system of scientific research and in a relatively weak industry. The final part of the paper identifies a few normative implications: much less emphasis should be put on various types of 'networking', and much more on policy measures aimed at strengthening both frontier research and European corporate actors.
