Users' participation in the accounting standard-setting process: A theory-building study [An article from: Accounting, Organizations and Society]

This digital document is a journal article from Accounting, Organizations and Society, published by Elsevier in 2007. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
The authors develop an explanatory theory using a meso-level approach and qualitative methodology to describe the participation of financial statement users in the standard-setting process (e.g. financial analysts and institutional investors). The theory links the characteristics of the standard-setting process to the individual determinants of users' participation. The instrumental, symbolic and systemic dimensions of Hardy's [Hardy, C. (1994). Power and politics in organizations. In C. Hardy, editor. Managing strategic action. London: Sage Publications] power framework are operationalized in the standard-setting context, and they introduce the descriptive categories of this process. The three determinants of behaviour of Vroom's [Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons] expectancy theory (valence, instrumentality and expectancy) provide the determinants of users' participation. Each type of legitimacy (pragmatic, moral and cognitive) identified by Suchman [Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20 (3), 571-610] in his typology is then used to link the descriptive categories of the standard-setting process to the determinants of participation suggested by Vroom. By combining the categories provided by Hardy, Vroom and Suchman, we propose a preliminary model of users' participation that we refine based on information gathered through interviews we conducted with Canadian users of financial statements.