Different insights for improving part and system reliability obtained from exactly same DFOM ''failure numbers'' [An article from: Reliability Engineering and System Safety]
Book Details
Author(s)H. Ascher
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000PDSP3G
ISBN-13978B000PDSP33
MarketplaceCanada 🇨🇦
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Reliability Engineering and System Safety, published by Elsevier in 2007. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
Techniques for improving the reliability and maintainability of both nonrepairable and repairable items can be suggested by failure data analysis. It is shown that a given set of failure numbers leads to very different improvement strategies when the numbers are the times-between-successive-failures of one or more repairable items, rather than the times-to-failure of nonrepairable items. Since this should have been obvious more than 50 years ago, at the onset of formal reliability engineering activities, several reasons are proffered for the widespread and protracted misinterpretation of even the most basic-and simple!-conceptual and practical differences between nonrepairable and repairable items.
Description:
Techniques for improving the reliability and maintainability of both nonrepairable and repairable items can be suggested by failure data analysis. It is shown that a given set of failure numbers leads to very different improvement strategies when the numbers are the times-between-successive-failures of one or more repairable items, rather than the times-to-failure of nonrepairable items. Since this should have been obvious more than 50 years ago, at the onset of formal reliability engineering activities, several reasons are proffered for the widespread and protracted misinterpretation of even the most basic-and simple!-conceptual and practical differences between nonrepairable and repairable items.
