Fire season and simulated grazing differentially affect the stability and drought resilience of a C"4 bunchgrass, C"3 bunchgrass and C"4 lawngrass [An article from: Journal of Arid Environments]

This digital document is a journal article from Journal of Arid Environments, published by Elsevier in 2007. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
We used a fully factorial experimental design to examine the effects of fire season, simulated grazing and their interaction on the temporal stability (year-to-year variation in production) of the C"4 bunchgrass, Bouteloua curtipendula, the C"3 bunchgrass, Nassella leucotricha, and the C"4 lawngrass, Buchloe dactyloides. Treatments included three levels of fire (winter fire, summer fire, and no fire) and two levels of grazing (simulated grazing and no grazing). Additionally, a severe drought during the fourth year of the five year study allowed us to examine each species' post-drought resilience. In the southern Great Plains, USA, these three perennial grass species are economically and ecologically important; each species is a dominant member of their functional group and important as livestock forage. Temporal stability and drought resilience of the C"4 bunchgrass, Bouteloua, were significantly greatest in the summer fire treatments. In contrast, temporal stability of the C"3 bunchgrass, Nassella, was significantly greatest in the no-fire treatments and its drought resilience was significantly greatest in the no-graze treatments. Temporal stability and drought resilience of the C"4 lawngrass, Buchloe, were not affected by any of the treatments. The contrasting effect of fire on the C"4 and C"3 bunchgrasses is consistent with the hypothesis that fire favors C"4 over C"3 grasses due to differences in post-fire soil conditions such as increased temperature, reduced moisture and reduced mineralizable nitrogen.