![Strengths and weaknesses of approaches to measuring policy positions of parties [An article from: Electoral Studies]](https://www.ebooknetworking.net/books/B00/0PD/bigB000PDT54O.jpg)
Strengths and weaknesses of approaches to measuring policy positions of parties [An article from: Electoral Studies]
Price not available for France
You can still browse on Amazon. Try another country above.
Book Details
Author(s)
A. Volkens
Publisher
Elsevier
ISBN / ASIN
B000PDT54O
ISBN-13
978B000PDT545
Marketplace
France 🇫🇷
Ratings & Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first!
No reviews yet.
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Electoral Studies, published by Elsevier in 2007. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
This article examines the measurement quality of the three main approaches to estimating policy positions of parties: expert surveys, the conventional content analysis of election programs by the Manifesto Research Group/Comparative Manifestos Project, and computer-assisted content analysis of election programs. Based on a literature review in tabular form containing quotations ordered according to major measurement problems, this contribution discusses the merits and shortcomings of the three approaches. The systematic comparison shows that all three approaches have their particular strengths and weaknesses. As a rule, the strength of one approach is the weakness of the others and vice versa. Therefore, the three approaches are not opposed to one another but complementary, so that all three are necessary for future research.
Description:
This article examines the measurement quality of the three main approaches to estimating policy positions of parties: expert surveys, the conventional content analysis of election programs by the Manifesto Research Group/Comparative Manifestos Project, and computer-assisted content analysis of election programs. Based on a literature review in tabular form containing quotations ordered according to major measurement problems, this contribution discusses the merits and shortcomings of the three approaches. The systematic comparison shows that all three approaches have their particular strengths and weaknesses. As a rule, the strength of one approach is the weakness of the others and vice versa. Therefore, the three approaches are not opposed to one another but complementary, so that all three are necessary for future research.
