Hazardous-industry restructuring to avoid liability for accidents [An article from: International Review of Law & Economics]
Book Details
Author(s)K. van 't Veld
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000PDTHE2
ISBN-13978B000PDTHE2
MarketplaceIndia 🇮🇳
Description
This digital document is a journal article from International Review of Law & Economics, published by Elsevier in 2006. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
Motivated by statistical and anecdotal evidence of hazardous-industry restructuring to avoid liability for accidents, this paper investigates how allowing for such restructuring affects the standard analysis of the judgment proof problem. It is shown that restructuring may either enhance or diminish the initial effect of imposing liability on accident rates and welfare. If the restructuring is towards smaller firms, the overall welfare effect of imposing liability may be negative. If it is towards larger firms, the overall welfare effect is unambiguously positive, but may paradoxically be enhanced if the restructuring can be prevented.
Description:
Motivated by statistical and anecdotal evidence of hazardous-industry restructuring to avoid liability for accidents, this paper investigates how allowing for such restructuring affects the standard analysis of the judgment proof problem. It is shown that restructuring may either enhance or diminish the initial effect of imposing liability on accident rates and welfare. If the restructuring is towards smaller firms, the overall welfare effect of imposing liability may be negative. If it is towards larger firms, the overall welfare effect is unambiguously positive, but may paradoxically be enhanced if the restructuring can be prevented.
